Re: do only critical work during single-user vacuum?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Geoghegan
Тема Re: do only critical work during single-user vacuum?
Дата
Msg-id CAH2-Wz=gkPvzf+H6nXtcxT2STGvh7-hmys4X-oGsihddZQte1Q@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: do only critical work during single-user vacuum?  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Ответы Re: do only critical work during single-user vacuum?  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
Re: do only critical work during single-user vacuum?  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 10:18 AM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> > I'm pretty sure that some people believe that wraparound can cause
> > actual data corruption
>
> Well, historically they're not wrong.

True, but the most recent version where that's actually possible is
PostgreSQL 8.0, which was released in early 2005. That was a very
different time for the project. I don't think that people believe that
wraparound can cause data corruption because they remember a time when
it really could. It seems like general confusion to me (which could
have been avoided).

At a minimum, we ought to be very clear on the fact that Postgres
isn't going to just let your database become corrupt in some more or
less predictable way. The xidStopLimit thing is pretty bad, but it's
still much better than that.

-- 
Peter Geoghegan



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: initdb / bootstrap design
Следующее
От: David Steele
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Allow root ownership of client certificate key