Re: [HACKERS] Review: GIN non-intrusive vacuum of posting tree

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Geoghegan
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Review: GIN non-intrusive vacuum of posting tree
Дата
Msg-id CAH2-Wz==43fmY1B3HiY7B+AqJVqsvqxJZiXRik05gsKM6_3Suw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Review: GIN non-intrusive vacuum of posting tree  (Andrew Borodin <borodin@octonica.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Review: GIN non-intrusive vacuum of posting tree
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 11:53 AM, Andrew Borodin <borodin@octonica.com> wrote:
> 2.  Thus, L&S fully concurrent vacuum is possible, indeed, and
> furthermore Theodor suggested that I should implement not only page
> eviction, but also page merge and tree condence algorithm.

I think that it's very hard to make merging of pages that are not
completely empty work, while also using the L&Y algorithm.


-- 
Peter Geoghegan

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] logical replication launcher crash on buildfarm
Следующее
От: Fabien COELHO
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] pgbench more operators & functions