Re: A small note on the portability of cmake
| От | Jesse Zhang |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: A small note on the portability of cmake |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAGf+fX6kQjSjR05fNMo83Ru4ZBLJH3qstB-UYrRuBtLFtGo+VA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | A small note on the portability of cmake (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: A small note on the portability of cmake
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Jan 19, 2019 at 8:50 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > Failed miserably. It turns out cmake has a hard dependency on libuv > which (a) has a hard dependency on atomic ops and (b) according to its > own docs, doesn't really care about any platforms other than > Linux/macOS/Windows and maybe FreeBSD.> I beg to disagree with point b above: the libuv project continually receives (and accepts) patches fixing bugs specifically for OpenBSD. Atomic ops (compare-and-exchange) might be a harder dependency to shed for libuv. Does the fallback onto compiler intrinsics (__sync_val_compare_and_swap, or on GCC 4.7+, __atomic_compare_exchange_n) not work here? Jesse
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: