Re: Heavy contgnous load
| От | Pavel Stehule |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Heavy contgnous load |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAFj8pRA=871vLwT+4DWaMKbqVK60JWqUjFD2eu23dDe+ypeJsw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Heavy contgnous load (kzsolt <kzsoltkzsolt@freemail.hu>) |
| Список | pgsql-performance |
Hello 2011/11/9 kzsolt <kzsoltkzsolt@freemail.hu>: > I try to found out more information. Looks like the COUNT(*) is not the > strongest part of pgr therfore I do a worakround. After this I have the > folwing result: > > Below the 1Mrec the row insert time is ~23msec. Above the 7Mrec the insert > time is ~180msec. > * use a copy statement * use a explicit transaction * if you can disable triggers (and RI) * if you cannot and use a RI, unsures a indexes on PK and FK Regards Pavel Stehule > I belive I use the fastest index type (default). > > So any idea to make postgres faster at higher number of records? > > > -- > View this message in context: http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/Heavy-contgnous-load-tp4913425p4978893.html > Sent from the PostgreSQL - performance mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > -- > Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance >
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: