On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 10:37 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> John Naylor <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> > With a bit of work, we could probably get rid of those includes. See
> > 27199058d98ef7f for one example.
>
> Yeah --- it would mean creating gram.h files for all the bison grammars
> not just a few of them, but it's certainly do-able if there's motivation
> to make the changes. Most of the files that are done that way date
> from before we knew about flex's %top.
I'll volunteer to work on this unless an easier solution happens to
come along in the next couple days. (aside: guc-file.l doesn't have a
grammar, so not yet sure if that makes the issue easier or harder...)
--
John Naylor
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com