On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 9:44 PM, Regina Obe <lr@pcorp.us> wrote:
> On 01/10/2016 08:07 AM, Bill Moran wrote:
>> So, the purpose of a CoC is twofold: >> >> A) Define what "being excellent" means to this particular >> community. >> B) Provide a process for how to resolve things when "being >> excellent" doesn't happen. >> >> Without #1, nobody will want to do #2, as it's basically a >> job that can never be done correctly.
> I agree with you completely. That is actually why I included the link to > the graphic in the last post. My point was, I have no intention of > having a CoC that is full of drivel. I would want a clear, concise, > no-B.S. CoC.
> JD
This may come as a big shock to many of you, but as a contributor I don't care if you are racist, sexist, transphobic or whatever as long as you
1) Are helpful when I ask a question 2) Stick to the topic 3) Don't get into petty etiquettes like "Please stop top posting" and if you really need to - A polite we prefer top posting would do
4) Are sensitive to people on other operating systems other than your preferred.
+1
My other concern about CoCs is I fear someone is going to come and demand we change Master/Slave to Leader/Follower, because Master is a male term and Slave is insensitive to grand-children of slaves.
Some people don't understand all these issues with she/he, for example, we in Russia are not really concern about this.