On 22 January 2016 at 19:47, Luz Violeta <luz.stancati@www.com.ar> wrote:
> And that's the foundation on
> which the CoC is being written. I saw the CoC go down, down, and down in
> content and quality, not taking stances for nothing and falling into
> generalizations.
As I understand it the main motivation for not wanting to accept the
Contributor Covenant is that experience has shown that it forces the
project team to behave as judge and jury on a contributor's personal
life. If you cannot accept that that is a reasonable standpoint, then
I guess we have nowhere to go. If you can, then please make your
suggestions as to how it can be improved within that limit; however
saying "why don't you just accept the CC" will not get anywhere.
> P.S → even now, I'm kinda terrified of a shitstorm in my first mail to the
> mailing list ...
Welcome to the list, I can't speak for anyone else but personally I
hope it brings you the joy you seek.
Geoff