Re: simplifying foreign key/RI checks

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Corey Huinker
Тема Re: simplifying foreign key/RI checks
Дата
Msg-id CADkLM=cFjr1CWp_6u-4wwMd_XN1AEtEASijZRfKxVFj3F4AGQg@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: simplifying foreign key/RI checks  (Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
I decided not to deviate from pk_ terminology so that the new code
doesn't look too different from the other code in the file.  Although,
I guess we can at least call the main function
ri_ReferencedKeyExists() instead of ri_PrimaryKeyExists(), so I've
changed that.

I agree with leaving the existing terminology where it is for this patch. Changing the function name is probably enough to alert the reader that the things that are called pks may not be precisely that.


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Printing backtrace of postgres processes
Следующее
От: James Hilliard
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] Fix detection of pwritev support for OSX.