Re: macaddr 64 bit (EUI-64) datatype support

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Shay Rojansky
Тема Re: macaddr 64 bit (EUI-64) datatype support
Дата
Msg-id CADT4RqBVGki0LCaW6C-015W3rMAa_UYV4HBevSVTs_oWPq3JfA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: macaddr 64 bit (EUI-64) datatype support  (Haribabu Kommi <kommi.haribabu@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: macaddr 64 bit (EUI-64) datatype support  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения
Yes. Before doing this change, it is better to confirm the approach and 
then do all the changes.

1. Does everyone agrees that renaming the existing datatype without
changing the OID?

As I said before, Npgsql for one loads data types by name, not by OID. So this would definitely cause breakage.

For users who actually need the new variable-length type, it seems perfectly reasonable to ask to switch to a new type - after all they're making a change in their system. It would really be preferable to leave the current type alone and create a new one.

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Re: [sqlsmith] FailedAssertion("!(XLogCtl->Insert.exclusiveBackup)", File: "xlog.c", Line: 10200)
Следующее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: WAL consistency check facility