On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 10:01 AM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 08, 2019 at 06:21:09PM -0300, Euler Taveira wrote:
> > Em qua, 8 de mai de 2019 às 14:19, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> escreveu:
> >> The question is; we should support vacuumdb option for (1), i.e.,,
> >> something like --index-cleanup option is added?
> >> Or for (2), i.e., something like --disable-index-cleanup option is added
> >> as your patch does? Or for both?
> >
> > --index-cleanup=BOOL
>
> I agree with Euler's suggestion to have a 1-1 mapping between the
> option of vacuumdb and the VACUUM parameter
+1. Attached the draft version patches for both options.
Regards,
--
Masahiko Sawada
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center