On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 6:24 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> I wrote:
> > Having said that, I'm fine with the idea of just marking these
> > parallel-restricted in HEAD and ignoring the problem in the back
> > branches.
>
> Hearing no complaints, done that way.
Although I thought that backpatching would be helpful for users who
start to use the supported PostgreSQL, I agree not to backpatching
since the likelihood that parallel workers execute these functions is
low.
Thank you for committing the patch!
Regards,
--
Masahiko Sawada
EnterpriseDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com/