Re: [HACKERS] Patches I'm thinking of pushing shortly

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Magnus Hagander
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Patches I'm thinking of pushing shortly
Дата
Msg-id CABUevEzsHVXXFnNfoj+f-s_hXKGRJdM5fW6QxS6p-b62KTSnLw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Patches I'm thinking of pushing shortly  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers


On Sun, Aug 13, 2017 at 11:43 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, Aug 13, 2017 at 5:24 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> I'd vote for including this in v10.  There doesn't seem to be any
>> downside to this: it's a no brainer to avoid our exploding hash table
>> case when we can see it coming.
>
> Anybody else want to vote that way?  For myself it's getting a bit late
> in the beta process to be including inessential changes, but I'm willing
> to push it to v10 not just v11 if there's multiple people speaking for
> that.

I'd vote for waiting until v11.  I think it's too late to be doing
things that might change good plans into bad ones or visca versa;
that's a recipe for having to put out 10.1 and 10.2 a little quicker
than I'd like.

+1 for waiting until v11 with it.

We have plenty enough other things that could end up needing a quick post-release-release, and those are things that have received at least somem testing...

--

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Arthur Zakirov
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Regressions failures with libxml2 on ArchLinux
Следующее
От: "Augustine, Jobin"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken