Re: Concurrently option for reindexdb

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Paquier
Тема Re: Concurrently option for reindexdb
Дата
Msg-id CAB7nPqT8B7DHTgMcTVZ4SGhQGAAUqBrdFin9VCd+D+7MtmhUxQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Concurrently option for reindexdb  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Ответы Re: Concurrently option for reindexdb
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 5:12 PM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> On 2014-08-26 12:44:43 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> I always was of the opinion that a exclusive lock is still *MUCH* better
> than what we have today.
Well, if somebody has some interest in that, here is a rebased patch
with the approach using low-level locks:
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAB7nPqRkwKFgn4BFUybqU-Oo-=Gcbq0K-8H93Gr6fX-GGRPDXg@mail.gmail.com
-- 
Michael

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Peter Geoghegan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Similar to csvlog but not really, json logs?
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [RFC, POC] Don't require a NBuffer sized PrivateRefCount array of local buffer pins