On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 12:49 AM, Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 2:27 PM, David Fetter <david@fetter.org> wrote:
>> Agreed that the "whole new language" aspect seems like way too big a
>> hammer, given what it actually does.
>
> Which would be easier to update when things change?
Regarding that both patches are equal compared to the current methods
with strcmp.
> Which would be possible to automatically generate from gram.y?
None of those patches take this approach.
--
Michael