On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 7:45 PM Ranier Vilela <ranier.vf@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Em sex., 19 de ago. de 2022 às 10:28, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> escreveu:
>>
>> Ranier Vilela <ranier.vf@gmail.com> writes:
>> > At function parallel_vacuum_process_all_indexes there is
>> > a typo with a logical connector.
>> > I think that correct is &&, because both of the operators are
>> > bool types [1].
>> > As a result, parallel vacuum workers can be incorrectly enabled.
>>
>> Since they're bools, the C spec requires them to promote to integer
>> 0 or 1, therefore the & operator will yield the desired result.
>> So there's not going to be any incorrect behavior.
>
>
> So, my assumption is incorrect.
>
Right, but as Tom pointed it is still better to change this. However,
I am not sure if we should backpatch this to PG15 as this won't lead
to any incorrect behavior.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.