Re: Remove incorrect assertion in reorderbuffer.c.

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Amit Kapila
Тема Re: Remove incorrect assertion in reorderbuffer.c.
Дата
Msg-id CAA4eK1KrY=1iMyfy1t4-MZWzf=TY-+fwPM-7JJHT5sZQc41PXw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Remove incorrect assertion in reorderbuffer.c.  (Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 11:19 AM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 5:33 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > We start recording changes in ReorderBufferTXN even before we reach
> > SNAPBUILD_CONSISTENT state so that if the commit is encountered after
> > reaching that we should be able to send the changes of the entire
> > transaction. Now, while recording changes if the reorder buffer memory
> > has exceeded logical_decoding_work_mem then we can start streaming if
> > it is allowed and we haven't yet streamed that data. However, we must
> > not allow streaming to start unless the snapshot has reached
> > SNAPBUILD_CONSISTENT state.
> >
> > I have also improved the comments atop ReorderBufferResetTXN to
> > mention the case when we need to continue streaming after getting an
> > error.
> >
> > Attached patch for the above changes.
> >
> > Thoughts?
>
> LGTM.
>

Thanks for the review, Pushed!

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Amit Kapila
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Single transaction in the tablesync worker?
Следующее
От: Sergei Kornilov
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pg_stat_statements oddity with track = all