Re: Probable CF bot degradation

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Thomas Munro
Тема Re: Probable CF bot degradation
Дата
Msg-id CA+hUKGLarXMhoaF71RMuzueh43fW8vBWaAh_0VpLZvUYfLOmng@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Probable CF bot degradation  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Probable CF bot degradation  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 12:23 PM Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 1:58 AM Matthias van de Meent
> <boekewurm+postgres@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Would you know how long the expected bitrot re-check period for CF
> > entries that haven't been updated is, or could the bitrot-checking
> > queue be displayed somewhere to indicate the position of a patch in
> > this queue?

Also, as for the show-me-the-queue page, yeah that's a good idea and
quite feasible.  I'll look into that in a bit.

> > Additionally, are there plans to validate commits of the main branch
> > before using them as a base for CF entries, so that "bad" commits on
> > master won't impact CFbot results as easy?
>
> How do you see this working?

[Now with more coffee on board]  Oh, right, I see, you're probably
thinking that we could look at
https://github.com/postgres/postgres/commits/master and take the most
recent passing commit as a base.  Hmm, interesting idea.



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Thomas Munro
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Probable CF bot degradation
Следующее
От: Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Tab completion for SET TimeZone