[Responding to two emails in one]
On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 2:44 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> ... or we could shorten those file names. I recall an episode
> awhile ago where somebody complained that their version of "tar"
> couldn't handle some of the path names in our tarball, so
> keeping things from getting to carpal-tunnel-inducing lengths
> does have its advantages.
On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 2:51 PM Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> wrote:
> Not bad, but I would instead shorten the names to detach-[1234] or
> detach-partition-[1234]. The marginal value of the second word is low, and
> the third word helps even less.
Alright, CC'ing Alvaro who added the long names to see if he wants to
consider that.
There's one other case of this phenomenon:
tuplelock-upgrade-no-deadlock overflows by one character.