Re: Unicode Variation Selector and Combining character
| От | Thomas Munro |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Unicode Variation Selector and Combining character |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CA+hUKGJnHawQbeZMP7iPfA_eQ_EE0AbAiJ15XC=aEEe1ywh9yg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | RE: Unicode Variation Selector and Combining character (荒井元成 <n2029@ndensan.co.jp>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Unicode Variation Selector and Combining character
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jun 1, 2022 at 6:15 PM 荒井元成 <n2029@ndensan.co.jp> wrote: > D209007=# select char_length(U&'\+0066FE' || U&'\+0E0103') ; > char_length > ------------- > 2 > (1 行) > > I expect length 1. No opinion here, but I did happen to see Noriyoshi Shinoda's slides about this topic a little while ago, comparing different databases: https://www.slideshare.net/noriyoshishinoda/postgresql-unconference-29-unicode-ivs It's the same with Latin combining characters... we count the individual codepoints of combining sequences: postgres=# select 'e' || U&'\0301', length('e' || U&'\0301'); ?column? | length ----------+-------- é | 2 (1 row)
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: