Re: [JDBC] Does the JDBC connection failover require Postgres 10?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Jorge Solórzano
Тема Re: [JDBC] Does the JDBC connection failover require Postgres 10?
Дата
Msg-id CA+cVU8Oxi_p4DMJ_n42_7X4PfqC0Y4f3NXQOggFKvNYMFnCk=w@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на [JDBC] Does the JDBC connection failover require Postgres 10?  (Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater@gmx.net>)
Список pgsql-jdbc
Дерево обсуждения
Hi Thomas,

The PgJDBC driver do not rely on the libpq library, the driver implements everything in pure Java.

Jorge Solórzano


On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 5:53 AM, Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater@gmx.net> wrote:
The Postgres JDBC driver offers a way to specify multiple hosts in the connection URL:

   https://jdbc.postgresql.org/documentation/head/connect.html#connection-failover

However, it is unclear to me if that feature relies on the libpq feature introduced in Postgres 10:

   https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/libpq-connect.html#libpq-multiple-hosts

or if this is handled by the driver internally?

Thomas


--
Sent via pgsql-jdbc mailing list (pgsql-jdbc@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-jdbc

В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Jorge Solórzano
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [JDBC] Cut 42.1.5 now and start merging for 42.2.0?
Следующее
От: "David G. Johnston"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [JDBC] Does the JDBC connection failover require Postgres 10?