Re: Request for vote to move forward with recovery.conf overhaul

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Simon Riggs
Тема Re: Request for vote to move forward with recovery.conf overhaul
Дата
Msg-id CA+U5nMLgvfbTQWSCpnV4-oxqVeQm+U6BO4nQN=hxqPGaYeBo4Q@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Request for vote to move forward with recovery.conf overhaul  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Request for vote to move forward with recovery.conf overhaul  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On 23 January 2013 04:49, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:

> - recovery.conf is removed (no backward compatibility in this version of the
> patch)

If you want to pursue that, you know where it leads. No, rebasing a
rejected patch doesn't help, its just relighting a fire that shouldn't
ever have been lit.

Pushing to do that out of order is just going to drain essential time
out of this CF from all of us.

-- Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Jeevan Chalke
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: unlogged tables vs. GIST
Следующее
От: Hari Babu
Дата:
Сообщение: pg_basebackup with -R option and start standby have problems with escaped password