On 6 May 2013 19:35, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> wrote:
> It certainly sounds interesting and I like the idea of it, but perhaps
> we need a different mechanism than just passing in a raw snapshot, to
> address the concerns that Tom raised.
It does *not* pass in a raw snapshot. All it does is to allow pg_dump
to use an API that is already exposed by the backend for this very
purpose, one that has been in Postgres since 9.2.
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/functions-admin.html#FUNCTIONS-SNAPSHOT-SYNCHRONIZATION
Minor patch, no amazing new functionality, no drama.
--Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services