Re: [REVIEW] pg_last_xact_insert_timestamp

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Simon Riggs
Тема Re: [REVIEW] pg_last_xact_insert_timestamp
Дата
Msg-id CA+U5nMJ2cg+h5aBToftq3jr2z8gtLEDLT_7NVjEJjD=rzg1tRg@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [REVIEW] pg_last_xact_insert_timestamp  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: [REVIEW] pg_last_xact_insert_timestamp  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:

> It also strikes me that anything
> that is based on augmenting the walsender/walreceiver protocol leaves
> anyone who is using WAL shipping out in the cold.  I'm not clear from
> the comments you or Simon have made how important you think that use
> case still is.

archive_timeout > 0 works just fine at generating files even when
quiet, or if it does not, it is a bug.

So I don't understand your comments, please explain.

--
 Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [REVIEW] pg_last_xact_insert_timestamp