On Tue, Dec 26, 2017 at 4:45 PM, Raúl Marín Rodríguez
<rmrodriguez@carto.com> wrote:
> I've implemented the overflow checks and made some benchmarks and the ipow()
> version became slower except with some specific inputs (base 0 for example).
> It's true that the new auxiliary functions could be optimized, but I don't
> think it makes sense to keep working on them just to match pow() speed.
>
> I'm attaching both patches in case someone wants to have a look but I would
> go with the simpler solution (pgbench_pow_v10.patch).
Committed the simpler solution after fixing it so that it compiles.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company