Re: Pluggable toaster

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: Pluggable toaster
Дата
Msg-id CA+Tgmobhqw4kr5wZaA08_XJirZzgfohtR0BOgB2UNRTOcnjLmQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Pluggable toaster  (Nikita Malakhov <hukutoc@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Pluggable toaster
Re: Pluggable toaster
Список pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Apr 4, 2022 at 12:13 PM Nikita Malakhov <hukutoc@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm really sorry. Messed up some code while merging rebased branches with previous (v1)
> patches issued in December and haven't noticed that seg fault because of corrupted code
> while running check-world.
> I've fixed messed code in Dummy Toaster package and checked twice - all's correct now,
> patches are applied correctly and tests are clean.
> Thank you for pointing out the error and for your patience!

Hi,

This patch set doesn't seem anywhere close to committable to me. For example:

- It apparently adds a new command called CREATE TOASTER but that
command doesn't seem to be documented anywhere.

- contrib/dummy_toaster is added in patch 1 with a no implementation
and code comments that say "Bloom index utilities" and then those
comments are fixed and an implementation is added in later patches.

- What is supposedly patch 1 is actually 32 patch files concatenated
together. It doesn't apply properly either with 'patch' or 'git am' so
I don't understand what we would even do with this.

- None of these patches have appropriate commit messages.

- Many of these patches add 'XXX' comments or errors or other
obviously unfinished bits of code. Some of this may be cleaned up by
later patches but it's hard to tell because right now one can't even
apply the patch set properly. Even if that were possible, it's the job
of the person submitting the patch to organize the patch into
independent, separately committable chunks that are self-contained and
have good comments and good commit messages for each one.

I don't think based on the status of this patch set that it's even
possible to provide useful feedback on the design at this point, never
mind getting anything committed.

-- 
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: JSON constructors and window functions
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: A test for replay of regression tests