Re: check fails on Fedora 23

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: check fails on Fedora 23
Дата
Msg-id CA+Tgmob_4f+C3u9H6oPoF0vDL7OSXCPOYt2DPHw+HZSN6thQow@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: check fails on Fedora 23  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Ответы Re: check fails on Fedora 23  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>)
Re: check fails on Fedora 23  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Oct 4, 2015 at 11:52 AM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:
> Isn't this arguably a Fedora regression? What did they change in F23 to make
> it fail? I note that F23 is still in Beta.

Maybe, but it's pretty unfriendly for us to complain about a library
issue, if it is one, by failing an Assert().  People with
non-assert-enabled builds will just get wrong answers.  Yuck.

Thinking about how this could happen, I believe that one possibility
is that there are two strings A and B and a locale L such that
strcoll_l(A, B, L) and memcmp(strxfrm(A, L), strxfrm(B, L)) disagree
(that is, the results are of different sign, or one is zero and the
other is not).

I don't have an environment handy to reproduce this, but it would be
nifty if someone could figure out exactly what strings are failing and
then provide the strcoll result and the strxfrm blobs for those
strings.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: about fsync in CLOG buffer write
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Re: In-core regression tests for replication, cascading, archiving, PITR, etc.