Re: [HACKERS] Parallel Append implementation

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Parallel Append implementation
Дата
Msg-id CA+TgmobFyhhWUcLYOXBwAdEwtgyLG4G-dqx=p-ibhrkFFMtQDA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Parallel Append implementation  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Parallel Append implementation  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 12:10 AM, Thomas Munro
<thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> It's not a scan, it's not a join and it's not an aggregation so I
> think it needs to be in a new <sect2> as the same level as those
> others.  It's a different kind of thing.

I'm a little skeptical about that idea because I'm not sure it's
really in the same category as far as importance is concerned, but I
don't have a better idea.  Here's a patch.  I'm worried this is too
much technical jargon, but I don't know how to explain it any more
simply.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Ildar Musin
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: MAP syntax for arrays
Следующее
От: Chapman Flack
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: MAP syntax for arrays