Re: Foreign join pushdown vs EvalPlanQual

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: Foreign join pushdown vs EvalPlanQual
Дата
Msg-id CA+Tgmob+74s0xascJ3z+v5B+a+3b51NK9Lyd2gWD7x_RUUNEJQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Foreign join pushdown vs EvalPlanQual  (Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Ответы Re: Foreign join pushdown vs EvalPlanQual  (Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Re: Foreign join pushdown vs EvalPlanQual  (Jeevan Chalke <jeevan.chalke@enterprisedb.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 3:04 AM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
<horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> I confirmed that an epqtuple of foreign parameterized scan is
> correctly rejected by fdw_recheck_quals with modified outer
> tuple.
>
> I have no objection to this and have two humble comments.
>
> In file_fdw.c, the comment for the last parameter just after the
> added line seems to be better to be aligned with other comments.

I've pgindented the file.  Any other space we might choose would just
be changed by the next pgindent run, so there's no point in trying to
vary.

> In subselect.c, the added break is in the added curly-braces but
> it would be better to place it after the closing brace, like the
> other cases.

Changed that, and committed.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robbie Harwood
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PATCH v3] GSSAPI encryption support
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Have dtrace depend on object files directly, not objfiles.txt