Re: FDW system columns

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: FDW system columns
Дата
Msg-id CA+Tgmoao2wDwLq9mBOU2MEum3qD2U0aiu28fd7p7-M3JVk8iOQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: FDW system columns  (Florian Pflug <fgp@phlo.org>)
Ответы Re: FDW system columns  (Shigeru Hanada <shigeru.hanada@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 6:57 PM, Florian Pflug <fgp@phlo.org> wrote:
> On Nov13, 2011, at 01:38 , Tom Lane wrote:
>> Just a couple hours ago I was wondering why we create system columns for
>> foreign tables at all.  Is there a reasonable prospect that they'll ever
>> be useful?  I can see potential value in tableoid, but the others seem
>> pretty dubious --- even if you were fetching from a remote PG server,
>> the XIDs would not be meaningful within our own environment.
>
> At least ctid seems useful too. I've used that in the past as a poor man's
> surrogate primary key.
>
> Also, people have used ctid and xmin in the past to re-find previously
> visited rows and to check whether they've been modified. So there might be
> some value in keeping xmin around also (and make the postgres fdw populate it)

My vote is to nuke 'em all.  :-)

I don't think that we want to encourage people to depend on the
existence of system columns any more than they do already.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: why do we need two snapshots per query?
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: why do we need two snapshots per query?