Re: dropping datumSort field

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: dropping datumSort field
Дата
Msg-id CA+TgmoaeFBR+n7NNTjGyDiQwpFur29OCthmtEp8cj=Ph_UEnoA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на dropping datumSort field  (Zhihong Yu <zyu@yugabyte.com>)
Ответы Re: dropping datumSort field  (Zhihong Yu <zyu@yugabyte.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Aug 8, 2022 at 5:51 PM Zhihong Yu <zyu@yugabyte.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> I was looking at ExecSort() w.r.t. datum sort.
>
> I wonder if the datumSort field can be dropped.
> Here is a patch illustrating the potential simplification.
>
> Please take a look.

One problem with this patch is that, if I apply it, PostgreSQL does not compile:

nodeSort.c:197:6: error: use of undeclared identifier 'tupDesc'
        if (tupDesc->natts == 1)
            ^
1 error generated.

Leaving that aside, I don't really see any advantage in this sort of change.

-- 
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Reducing the chunk header sizes on all memory context types
Следующее
От: Andrew Dunstan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size