Re: Review: Non-inheritable check constraints

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: Review: Non-inheritable check constraints
Дата
Msg-id CA+TgmoacgSA0h-sBexgfuVyPLsGH2Of6X+y+zN2k_tPV0kL3iA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Review: Non-inheritable check constraints  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
Ответы Re: Review: Non-inheritable check constraints  (Nikhil Sontakke <nikkhils@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 2:06 PM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre@commandprompt.com> wrote:
> Yeah.  Nikhil, Alex, this is the merged patch.  Have a look that it
> still works for you (particularly the pg_dump bits) and I'll commit it.
> I adjusted the regression test a bit too.

It seems hard to believe that ATExecDropConstraint() doesn't need any
adjustment.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: why do we need create tuplestore for each fetch?
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: archive_keepalive_command