Re: PATCH: optimized DROP of multiple tables within a transaction
| От | Robert Haas |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: PATCH: optimized DROP of multiple tables within a transaction |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CA+TgmoaVQckAJ6GbRW4OOPV4oQm-NGW+EYt=VVyqVD9qTXi+LQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: PATCH: optimized DROP of multiple tables within a transaction (Tomas Vondra <tv@fuzzy.cz>) |
| Ответы |
Re: PATCH: optimized DROP of multiple tables within a transaction
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Tomas Vondra <tv@fuzzy.cz> wrote:
> I thought I followed the conding style - which guidelines have I broken?
+ /* If there are no non-local relations, then we're done. Release the memory
+ * and return. */
Multi-line comments should start with a line containing only /* and
end with a line containing only */.
+DropRelFileNodeAllBuffers(RelFileNodeBackend * rnodes, int nnodes)
and
+rnode_comparator(const void * p1, const void * p2)
The extra spaces after the asterisks should be removed.
+void smgrdounlinkall(SMgrRelation * rels, int nrels, bool isRedo)
+{
void should be on a line by itself.
Sorry to nitpick.
As for BSEARCH_LIMIT, I don't have a great idea - maybe just
DROP_RELATIONS_BSEARCH_LIMIT?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: