Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw super user checks

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw super user checks
Дата
Msg-id CA+TgmoaQ9pwCZfdbvkZwhooNNAuaDJeQBmgmnDvrWbh1fHEPTw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw super user checks  (Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw super user checks  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw super user checks  (Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>)
Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw super user checks  (Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 5:57 PM, Ashutosh Bapat
<ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> I think the real behaviour can be described as something like this:
>
> "Only superusers may connect to foreign servers without password
> authentication, so always specify the <literal>password</literal>
> option for user mappings that may be used by non-superusers." But
> which user mappings may be used by non-superusers can not be defined
> without explaining views owned by superusers. I don't think we should
> be talking about views in that part of documentation.

Well, if we don't, then I'm not sure we can really make this clear.

Anyhow, I've committed the patch to master for now; we can keep
arguing about what, if anything, to do for back-branch documentation.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Local indexes for partitioned table
Следующее
От: Stephen Frost
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw super user checks