Re: Relax requirement for INTO with SELECT in pl/pgsql

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: Relax requirement for INTO with SELECT in pl/pgsql
Дата
Msg-id CA+TgmoaHrLNdTE2H2thricOXYeOCwSedEoHYEvLpM357Fbb_dg@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Relax requirement for INTO with SELECT in pl/pgsql  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Relax requirement for INTO with SELECT in pl/pgsql  (Brendan Jurd <direvus@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 6:49 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> So, I'm -1 on not having any keyword at all.  I have no objection
> to Merlin's proposal though.  I agree that PERFORM is starting to
> look a bit silly, since it doesn't play with WITH for instance.

Yeah, I think requiring PERFORM is stupid and annoying.  +1 for
letting people write a SELECT with no target.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Merlin Moncure
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Relax requirement for INTO with SELECT in pl/pgsql
Следующее
От: Abhijit Menon-Sen
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: dealing with extension dependencies that aren't quite 'e'