Re: Include ppc64le build type for back branches

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: Include ppc64le build type for back branches
Дата
Msg-id CA+Tgmoa1hsbk5VH467KO5AYWzdpH1N2Xmn_3M-fATQ8_ZG+zXw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Include ppc64le build type for back branches  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Ответы Re: Include ppc64le build type for back branches  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: Include ppc64le build type for back branches  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 12:24 PM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:
>>> So, config.guess should be changed to include the build type for ppc64le
>>> like it is in 9.4+ branches.
>>
>> So far as I can tell from a quick troll of the git history, we have never
>> ever updated config.guess/config.sub in released branches.  I'm a bit
>> hesitant to do it in this case either: it would amount to retroactively
>> adding support for a platform, which sure sounds like a new feature.
>>
>> My vote would be to adjust your buildfarm critter to only try to build
>> 9.4 and up.
>>
>
> Or put what he said works in his critter's build-farm.conf in the
> config_opts section, something like:
>
>     --build=powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu

I don't really want to get into an argument about this, but is the
reason we haven't updated config.guess and config.sub in the past that
it presents an actual stability risk, or just that nobody's asked
before?  Because the first one is a good reason not to do it now, but
the second one isn't.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Rework the way multixact truncations work
Следующее
От: Merlin Moncure
Дата:
Сообщение: fix for readline terminal size problems when window is resized with open pager