Re: Hot Standby WAL reply uses heavyweight session locks, but doesn't have enough infrastructure set up

On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 2:41 AM, Michael Paquier
<michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
> Andres Freund wrote:
>> I think this isn't particularly pretty, but it seems to be working well
>> enough, and changing it would be pretty invasive. So keeping in line
>> with all that code seems to be easier.
> OK, I'm convinced with this part to remove the call of
> LockSharedObjectForSession that uses dontWait and replace it by a loop
> in ResolveRecoveryConflictWithDatabase.

That seems right to me, too.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company