Re: Manual anti-wraparound vacuums

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: Manual anti-wraparound vacuums
Дата
Msg-id CA+TgmoZXCahbQ+1_VPBQrh9pJXZL9hNwT=D0UJykkJDk4vud4A@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Manual anti-wraparound vacuums  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Manual anti-wraparound vacuums  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
Re: Manual anti-wraparound vacuums  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 9:59 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> In another thread, Alvaro quoted from the manual:
>>       If for some reason autovacuum fails to clear old XIDs from a table, the
>>       system will begin to emit warning messages like this when the database's oldest
>>       XIDs reach ten million transactions from the wraparound point:
>
>>       WARNING:  database "mydb" must be vacuumed within 177009986 transactions
>>       HINT:  To avoid a database shutdown, execute a database-wide VACUUM in "mydb".
>
>>       (A manual VACUUM should fix the problem, as suggested by the hint; but
>>       note that the VACUUM must be performed by a superuser, else it will fail to
>>       process system catalogs and thus not be able to advance the database's
>>       datfrozenxid.)
>
> It occurs to me to wonder how this scenario will interact with the
> recent changes to let VACUUM skip pages.  AFAIR there is not a way for a
> manual VACUUM to set the anti-wraparound mode, is there?

I tweaked Simon's original patch to address exactly this scenario;
VACUUM FREEZE prevents page-skipping behavior.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: why do we need two snapshots per query?
Следующее
От: "Albe Laurenz"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Disable OpenSSL compression