On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 2:26 PM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre@commandprompt.com> wrote:
> Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of lun nov 14 15:56:43 -0300 2011:
>
>> Well, it looks to me like there are three different places that we
>> need to nail down: RangeVarGetAndCheckCreationNamespace() is used for
>> relations (except that a few places call RangeVarGetCreationNamespace
>> directly, which means my previous patch probably needs some tweaking
>> before commit), QualifiedNameGetCreationNamespace() is used for pretty
>> much all other schema-qualified objects, and LookupCreationNamespace()
>> is used for ALTER BLAH SET SCHEMA (which I think has a problem when
>> you rename an object into a schema that is concurrently being
>> dropped).
>>
>> I'm fairly unhappy with the idea of modifying a function that is
>> described as doing a "get" or "lookup" to have the side effect of
>> "locking something". So probably some renaming or refactoring is in
>> order here. It seems like we're duplicating almost identical logic in
>> an awful lot of places in namespace.c.
>
> So RangeVarGetCheckAndLockCreationNamespace(), uh? Pity you can't
> stick a comma in there.
Yeah, really. :-)
Actually, I think that one could probably stay as-is. "Check" implies
that there's something else going on besides just a lookup, and we
can't go nuts with it. I'm more concerned about
QualifiedNameGetCreationNamespace() and LookupCreationNamespace().
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company