On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 12:11 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> AFAIR, there are zero promises about how effective, or when effective,
> changes in SET STORAGE will be. And the number of complaints about
> that has also been zero. So I'm not sure why we need to do more for
> SET COMPRESSION. Especially since I'm unconvinced that recompressing
> everything just to recompress everything would *ever* be worthwhile.
I think it is good to have *some* way of ensuring that what you want
the system to do, it is actually doing. If we have not a single
operation in the system anywhere that can force recompression, someone
who actually cares will be left with no option but a dump and reload.
That is probably both a whole lot slower than something in the server
itself and also a pretty silly thing to have to tell people to do.
If it helps, I'd be perfectly fine with having this be an *optional*
behavior for CLUSTER or VACUUM FULL, depending on some switch. Or we
can devise another way for the user to make it happen. But we
shouldn't just be setting a policy that users are not allowed to care
whether their data is actually compressed using the compression method
they specified.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com