On Thu, May 2, 2024 at 9:38 AM Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org> wrote:
> On 30.04.24 14:39, Daniel Verite wrote:
> > postgres=# SELECT '.foo.' like '_oo' COLLATE ign_punct;
> > ?column?
> > ----------
> > f
> > (1 row)
> >
> > The first two results look fine, but the next one is inconsistent.
>
> This is correct, because '_' means "any single character". This is
> independent of the collation.
Seems really counterintuitive. I had to think for a long time to be
able to guess what was happening here. Finally I came up with this
guess:
If the collation-aware matching tries to match up f with the initial
period, the period is skipped and the f matches f. But when the
wildcard is matched to the initial period, that uses up the wildcard
and then we're left trying to match o with f, which doesn't work.
Is that right?
It'd probably be good to use something like this as an example in the
documentation. My intuition is that if foo matches a string, then _oo
f_o and fo_ should also match that string. Apparently that's not the
case, but I doubt I'll be the last one who thinks it should be.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com