Re: Refactor xlog.c #1 - startup.c

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: Refactor xlog.c #1 - startup.c
Дата
Msg-id CA+TgmoYZkShm_sG6=4MPC50XhLZgzTXq-d1oYCnNDQtj+iwWTg@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Refactor xlog.c #1 - startup.c  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: Refactor xlog.c #1 - startup.c  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 4:44 AM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> Patch removes stuff related to "startup process" and creates files
> under src/$DIR/postmaster for this code.
>
> This makes startup process look more like bgwriter, walwriter etc..

In general, +1.

But I don't think we want duplicate function prototypes for the same
functions, so -1 for this hunk:

+ /* in xlog.c */
+ extern void WakeupRecovery(void);
+ extern void StartupXLOG(void);

The existing prototypes in xlog.h seem like they should be just fine.

IsPromoteTriggered could be simplified to just "return
promote_triggered;"; you don't need to branch.

I think one thing that would be worth considering in terms of future
refactoring is to split up the gigantic StartupXLOG() function in some
fashion.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Stephen Frost
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Thoughts on "SELECT * EXCLUDING (...) FROM ..."?
Следующее
От: Andrew Dunstan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Thoughts on "SELECT * EXCLUDING (...) FROM ..."?