oversight in parallel aggregate

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема oversight in parallel aggregate
Дата
Msg-id CA+TgmoY41dpHOEXkGStvHj0dAh4cRvy_XjXFEdGsPoCSfy+EtA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответы Re: oversight in parallel aggregate  (David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com>)
Re: oversight in parallel aggregate  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
One of my EDB colleagues, while in the process of refactoring some
unrelated Advanced Server code, discovered that (1) there's no way to
mark an aggregate as anything other than parallel-unsafe but (2) it
doesn't matter because has_parallel_hazard ignores Aggrefs anyway.
These mistakes cancel each other out (sorta) if all of your aggregates
happen to be parallel-safe, but otherwise not so much.  Barring
objections, I intend to speedily apply the attached patch to fix this.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Peter Geoghegan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: WIP: Covering + unique indexes.
Следующее
От: Robbie Harwood
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PATCH v12] GSSAPI encryption support