On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 2:07 PM Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com> wrote:
> On 2020/02/03 11:05, Amit Langote wrote:
> > Okay. How about the attached?
>
> Thanks for the patches! You added the note just after the description
> about row level security on inherited table, but isn't it better to
> add it before that? Attached patch does that. Thought?
Yeah, that might be a better flow for that paragraph.
> > Maybe, we should also note the LOCK TABLE exception?
>
> Yes.
Note that, unlike TRUNCATE, LOCK TABLE exception exists in HEAD too,
but maybe you're aware of that.
Thanks,
Amit