Re: assert pg_class.relnatts is consistent

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Amit Langote
Тема Re: assert pg_class.relnatts is consistent
Дата
Msg-id CA+HiwqEZNGG_g2pq-+tTFhj7cqbPtbBRL6Ycgfu_F2t+-ZyWgw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на assert pg_class.relnatts is consistent  (Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>)
Ответы Re: assert pg_class.relnatts is consistent  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Re: assert pg_class.relnatts is consistent  (Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>)
Re: assert pg_class.relnatts is consistent  (Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 3:23 AM Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com> wrote:
> Forking this thread for two tangential patches which I think are more
> worthwhile than the original topic's patch.
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20200207143935.GP403%40telsasoft.com
>
> Is there a better place to implement assertion from 0002 ?

I would think the answer to that would be related to the answer of why
you think we need this assert in the first place?

I know I have made the mistake of not updating relnatts when I added
relispartition, etc. to pg_class, only to be bitten by it in the form
of seemingly random errors/crashes.  Is that why?

Thanks,
Amit



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Haumacher, Bernhard"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Error on failed COMMIT
Следующее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: assert pg_class.relnatts is consistent