Re: A test for replay of regression tests
От
Andres Freund
Тема
Re: A test for replay of regression tests
Дата
Msg-id
C5105396-9938-4CEE-8711-94481F311102@anarazel.de
Ответ на
Re: A test for replay of regression tests (Tom Lane)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
A test for replay of regression tests Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Re: A test for replay of regression tests Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: A test for replay of regression tests Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: A test for replay of regression tests Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: A test for replay of regression tests Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: A test for replay of regression tests Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: A test for replay of regression tests Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Re: A test for replay of regression tests Anastasia Lubennikova <lubennikovaav@gmail.com>
Re: A test for replay of regression tests Anastasia Lubennikova <lubennikovaav@gmail.com>
Re: A test for replay of regression tests Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Re: A test for replay of regression tests Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Re: A test for replay of regression tests Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Re: A test for replay of regression tests Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Re: A test for replay of regression tests Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Re: A test for replay of regression tests Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Re: A test for replay of regression tests Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Re: A test for replay of regression tests Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Re: A test for replay of regression tests Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: A test for replay of regression tests Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Re: A test for replay of regression tests Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: A test for replay of regression tests Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Re: A test for replay of regression tests Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: A test for replay of regression tests Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: A test for replay of regression tests Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
Re: A test for replay of regression tests Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Re: A test for replay of regression tests Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
Re: A test for replay of regression tests Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Re: A test for replay of regression tests Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: A test for replay of regression tests Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Re: A test for replay of regression tests Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Re: A test for replay of regression tests Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Re: A test for replay of regression tests Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
RE: A test for replay of regression tests "tsunakawa.takay@fujitsu.com" <tsunakawa.takay@fujitsu.com>
Re: A test for replay of regression tests Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Hi, On February 1, 2022 6:11:24 PM PST, Tom Lane wrote: >Thomas Munro writes: >> It looks like it's processing statements fairly consistently slowly >> through the whole period. Each non-trivial statement takes a bit >> under ~10ms, so it would make sense if by the time we've processed >> ~2.5k lines we've clocked up 30 seconds and a VACUUM replay whacks us. > >This test is set up to time out after 30 seconds? We've long had >an unofficial baseline that no timeouts under 180 seconds should >be used in the buildfarm. 30s is the default value of the streaming replay conflict timeout. After that the startup process cancelled the session running pg_dump. So it's not an intentional timeout in the test. It's not surprising that pg_dump takes 30s on that old a machine. But more than 2min still surprised me. Is that really do be expected? - Andres -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления