Re: Annoying Reply-To
От | ries van Twisk |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Annoying Reply-To |
Дата | |
Msg-id | BFADCD42-73F9-47E8-989E-92FF353B9E55@rvt.dds.nl обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Annoying Reply-To (Collin Kidder <adderd@kkmfg.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Annoying Reply-To
("Rob Wultsch" <wultsch@gmail.com>)
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Oct 23, 2008, at 12:25 PM, Collin Kidder wrote: > Bruce Momjian wrote: >>> >>> Mikkel is right, every other well-organized mailing list I've ever >>> been on handles things the sensible way he suggests, but everybody >>> on his side who's been on lists here for a while already knows >>> this issue is a dead horse. Since I use the most advanced e-mail >>> client on the market I just work around that the settings here are >>> weird, it does annoy me a bit anytime I stop to think about it >>> though. >>> >> >> I think this is the crux of the problem --- if I subscribed to >> multiple >> email lists, and some have "rely" going to the list and some have >> "reply" going to the author, I would have to think about the right >> reply >> option every time I send email. >> >> Fortunately, every email list I subscribe to and manage behaves >> like the >> Postgres lists. >> >> > > I find it difficult to believe that every list you subscribe to > behaves as the Postgres list does. Not that I'm doubting you, just > that it's difficult given that the PG list is the ONLY list I've > ever been on to use Reply as just replying to the author. Every > other list I've ever seen has reply as the list address and requires > Reply All to reply to the original poster. Thus, I would fall into > the category of people who have to think hard in order to do the > correct thing when posting to this list. I have the same experience, only PG list seems to behave different. In my humble opinion I feel that I am subscribed to the list (It also says on the bottom Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org )), so a reply (not reply all --- remove original author) should go back to the list where I am subscribed at, in in my opinion the source is the list aswell (that's why I am getting it in the first place). > > > I've checked and I can't even find an option to make Thunderbird > (the client I use in windows) reply to the list properly with the > reply button (it just cannot be set that way.) You must use Reply > All. You might say that that makes Thunderbird crippled but I see it > more as a sign that nobody outside of a few fussy RFC worshipping > types would ever want the behavior of the Postgre list. Yes, I'll > have to live with the current behavior. Yes, it's an RFC standard. > But, even after having heard the arguments I'm not convinced that > this list's behavior is desirable. YMMV. mail.App is crippled aswell.. I think I will install Mutt again for convenience --- just kidding... Ries
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: