Re: pgpool versus sequences

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: pgpool versus sequences
Дата
Msg-id BANLkTingyUTptpHVPENFsEfMn4fSP5WH+g@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: pgpool versus sequences  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: pgpool versus sequences
Список pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 6:53 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Please note also that what pgpool users have got right now is a time
> bomb, which is not better than immediately-visible breakage.  I would
> prefer to try to get this change out ahead of widespread adoption of the
> broken pgpool version.

Hmm, I gather from what Tatsuo is saying at the web site that this has
only been broken since the release of 3.0 on February 23rd, so given
that I think your approach makes sense.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pgpool versus sequences
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pgpool versus sequences