On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 2:22 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 7:25 AM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>> With regards to the naming, I think it would be better if we kept
>> XLOG_XACT_COMMIT record exactly as it is now, and make the second
>> record an entirely new record called XLOG_XACT_COMMIT_FASTPATH. That
>> way we retain backwards compatibility.
>
> I liked your previous suggestion of commit and commit-with-info
> better. There's nothing particularly fast about this; it's just less
> info. So to speak.
The important thing is that we retain backwards compatibility with
current XLOG_XACT_COMMIT. I'm not worried what we call the other one.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services