On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 16:30, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 19:45, Alvaro Herrera
> <alvherre@commandprompt.com> wrote:
>> Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of mar jun 28 10:39:22 -0400 2011:
>>
>>> I think it would be sensible to block branch removal, as there's
>>> basically never a scenario where we'd do that during current usage.
>>> I'm not excited about blocking branch addition, although I worry
>>> sooner or later somebody will accidentally push a private development
>>> branch :-(. Is it possible to block only removal and not addition?
>>
>> If we can tweak the thing, how about we only allow creating branches
>> that match a certain pattern, say ^REL_\d+_\d+_STABLE$?
>
> I've put this in place - except I used ^REL\d+... and not what you
> suggested, since that's how we name our branches :P
>
> I'm going to push an actual valid branch, let's say 9.7, and then
> remove it again, just to make sure things worked (with it installed I
> cannot push an invalid branch, so i can't test the branch removal
> block). So don't panic if you see that one :)
Ok, I'm done experimenting and this is now in production.
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/