On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 2:22 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 10:19 PM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:
>> On 03/18/2011 09:18 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 6:56 PM, Andrew Dunstan<andrew@dunslane.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> +<literal>0.0.0.0/0</literal> (<quote>all balls</>) represents all
>>>> + IPv4 addresses, and<literal>::</literal> represents
>>>> + all IPv6 addresses.
>>>>
>>>> Umm, isn't there a missing netmask there? The IPv6 analog of 0.0.0.0/0 is
>>>> surely ::/0 (or I would usually write it ::0/0).
>>>
>>> "all balls" seems like a colloquialism best avoided in our documentation.
>>>
>>
>> It's already there, although I agree it's infelicitous.
>
> I vote for taking it out. I think that could be interpreted as inappropriate.
I agree.
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company